Just a couple years ago, searching for case precedent was a tough and time consuming task, necessitating men and women to search through print copies of case law, or to buy access to commercial online databases. Today, the internet has opened up a host of case regulation search choices, and many sources offer free access to case law.
“The evidence regarding wajtakkar and extra-judicial confession being relied upon because of the prosecution against the petitioner and his earlier mentioned mentioned co-accused namely Hussain Bakhsh has already been opined through the Lahore High Court, Lahore in its order dated two-twelve-2010 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.
This Court might interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in the fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the summary or finding achieved with the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. When the summary or finding is which include no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court could interfere with the conclusion or maybe the finding and mould the relief to make it proper on the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-value the evidence or even the nature of punishment. About the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified because of the decision in the Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
competent authority and if any appeal or representation is filed the same shall be decided(Promotion)
Preceding four tax years interpreted. It's not necessarily from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more
This Court could interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer within a fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding reached through the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In the event the summary or finding is which include no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mildew the relief to make it appropriate to your facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-recognize the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. Within the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified with the decision with the Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
S. Supreme Court. Generally speaking, proper case citation includes the names from the parties to the original case, the court in which the case was heard, the date it was decided, as well as the book in which it really is recorded. Different citation requirements may possibly involve italicized or underlined text, and certain specific abbreviations.
Extra username and password are needed for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
9. Needless to mention that any observations made in the above order are tentative in nature and shall not influence the trial Court.
VI) The petitioner is at the rear of the bars considering that arrest, investigation from the case is complete, he is no more necessary with the purpose of investigation and at this stage to keep him driving the bars before summary of trial will serve no valuable purpose.
Criminal cases During the common regulation tradition, courts decide the law applicable to a case by interpreting statutes and applying precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. Compared with most civil website legislation systems, common legislation systems Keep to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their individual previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all lessen courts should make decisions steady with the previous decisions of higher courts.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
13309-B of 2010 for being weak types of evidence along with the evidentiary value whereof would be witnessed at the time in the trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, Hence, confirmed custody of your petitioner in jail is not going to serve any useful purpose at this stage.”
To receive notification from the Supreme Court of Virginia plus the Court of Appeals of Virginia when opinions, orders, rule changes, dockets and other information has become readily available, please enter your contact information under.